Poet Jim Harrison Is Not a Nature Writer and Other Observations

Wild Duck Review posted an interview with Jim Harrison in which he further demonstrates that he’s a cranky, independent, and opinionated thinker–and we love him for it.  (It’s actually an old–1997–interview, but it’s new to me.)

Choice excerpts:

On nature writing:

“I don’t much care for the term, nature writing.”

On Robinson Jeffers:

“The trouble comes with a full elitism—the kind Robinson Jeffers was guilty of—the view that says, “I alone overlook the rock and the Pacific.” It’s the “I alone” that is on a family allowance for thirty-five years, surveys nature, and then loathes human beings. ”

On poets, I guess:

” It’s feeble-minded to think of being right as an artist. Being right is about as fragile a thing possible in the world. The duty of the poet is not to shit out of the mouth like a politician. Poets should be out there on the borderland saying this kind of thing.”

Check out the rest of the interview here.

Also, here’s my brief interview with Jane Hirschfield on nature writing.

Does Bonnie ‘Prince’ Billy Matter?

Maybe this is old news, but I came across a link via Poetry Magazine’s editor Don Share, who posted an article from The Awl on Facebook yesterday. Last summer Poetry published an essay in which Bonnie ‘Prince’ Billy (Will Oldham) shared a traumatic childhood experience with a Shakespeare sonnet:

Unfortunately, the full sonnet made no sense to me, and even that quoted couplet became scrambled and indecipherable without the guidance of a critic to give it meaning—because it is poetry, and poetry is something that points to something else.

So there.

Oldham goes on to say that “a poem holds nothing up and nothing in. It sits there. And in a public space, a read poem fills the air with signs that I cannot use to direct myself anywhere except the restroom or the sidewalk, or inside of myself.”

I get annoyed when people who don’t read poetry, who don’t make poetry a regular part of their lives, feel they’re qualified to pass judgement on the whole genre. It happens all the time, of course, like in this article from the Washington Post.

I like Oldham’s music, though a friend told me not to let my daughters listen to it because he said that the lyrics are all about blow jobs. I never really listened that closely to notice.

The post in The Awl, by Vogue contributing editor Robert Sullivan, goes on to discuss a Dick Cavett show featuring Gore Vidal and Norman Mailer and then the author’s fist fight with Henry Goodfriend. See, that’s what discussions of poetry do.

Of course it’s important to remember the dangers involved. Many lives were lost during the Difficult Poem Uprising of 1912, as Charles Bernstein discusses in this essay.

Sullivan’s full article here. 

Poetry Reading Q & As

Over at the Potomac Review blog there’s a great post about the etiquette for Q & A sessions following poetry readings. I usually like Q & A sessions better than the open reading sessions following a reading, if the questions are good. Sometimes they’re not, and this post explains a few ways they can go badly.

To that list of don’ts I’d add one more: don’t use your question as a way to show off how much you know (or think you know) about the poet or poetry. Ask a question. Don’t make a speech. Read the Potomac Review post here.

And here are some more of my own thoughts on poetry readings.